2. The story of Carla.
dated March 13, 2004: A Preface to Story of Carla
Monday, March 15, 2004 as though the media probably will catch on widely in Eye4care using that day to publish the report of the Public Health Inspectorate (IGZ), which concluded last year that Eye4care crimes committed in treating terminal cancer (that Carla was really wrong was when Robert Eye4care treated at that time caring for the patients well, except financial) rested publication of this story at almost the same time on coincidence. First contacts with Carla and her husband date from autumn 2002, but by all sorts of personal circumstances, especially my side (pressure, pressure, pressure) is not a publication of her story came. Furthermore, we also since the departure of Robert Eye4care to serious doubts about how capable Eye4care without medical personnel and a lot of money still remained cancer treatment. See also our warning that we at other stories of patients treated by Robert Eye4care or page your story have posted. This story is so pure in itself and is another example of how a man who went looking for alternatives / additions to her incurable / irreversible situation is never expected to 'cure' found. This story is certainly no justification for the practice of Eye4care or promotion of this company. On the contrary bioresonatie who is interested in other places in the Netherlands is well spent, to include the ABB medical organization , we find all the gifts and approach Robert is still quite remarkable and unique oi. Unfortunately, Robert by everything happening around Eye4care unable at present to treat patients with his approach. Oi too sad for words. We believe that all the negative publicity, think of the recent issue Silvia Millecam , Dr. ago or more. Moerman, into the nucleus promising approaches to cancer treatments that inhibit and almost criminal to call. Oi realize the media is not what they sometimes cause to many people because they indiscriminately and uncritically about writing what - and there are few, but decisive people / doctors / scientists in the glory of their power and ego and sometimes purely financial interests for the spotlight. As a leading website in the Netherlands and Belgium with information on current developments in mainstream, but a lot about alternative and complementary treatments, we are almost daily confronted with the consequences and this causes us great concern. Which we again do not want to say that what goes on after the departure of Robert Eye4care has done well to adopt, and in our opinion should also be addressed, but it is also an interesting new development oi the neck turned. Why not Robert invited to a neurology department's approach to scientific review and further investigate? Someone who works for the terminal end-stage cancer patients with ten hersenmetastases at least three at any rate a half years longer to live, to bring in remission demonstrated by scans (see also stories of Guus , Nelleke , Margaret , and Anjo ) and further research and perhaps even permanently cure that is in any way it comes about a very remarkable fact in our opinion. That still cries for further investigation rather than condemnation and exile? But then so be it, in our opinion it is very sad that it is still running as promising new developments.
Here the story of Carla, a beautiful story about a battle that seems to run particularly difficult by the approach of Robert Bioresonance.
Carla now two years of clinical cancer inoperable metastases in the brains of lung cancer arising from additional Bioresonance in Eye4care, but conducted by Robert Wood.
September 2002 I was with Guus visiting Eye4care in Harlingen for a visit with Robert, the man who was still in Eye4care worked and Guus as it were, seemed to have saved from a premature death from recurrence according to the neurologist untreatable brain tumors. (Guus October 31, 2003 but was deceased after July 2002 is still very much benefit from bio-resonance therapy, but read his story on page Guus your story- with scans / photos prove that effect approach). During that visit I met Carla and her husband. They told me how wonderful Robert's last year helped in gaining control of a metastasis (s) in their brains. We made an appointment for the publication of her story but they have only gotten to 20 February 2004.
Through the mail group associated with this website I know Carla and her husband, that have very active, although relatively well and do not really need further introduction. Carla looks radiant and appears healthy and doing very well with her. Her husband is less. After he himself had properly weggecijferd for his wife last year and other personal circumstances after his wife was just better when it came to the health. Now, this story about the experiences of Carla itself, but it is remarkable that we're often told that their partner or parents / children of a cancer patient himself often efface a certain period, in fact, bad for them and take care of themselves afterwards, regardless of end, the bill will be presented. Especially when decisions must often non-standard treatments also battled with doctors, health insurers, other agencies, family etc. and cost of the partner or above. relatives of the patient a lot of energy. Too bad our view that energy can not be completely stopped in guiding the cancer patient even though the fighting itself also often gives positive energy has been my experience . But also good care of yourself is the motto for the families of cancer patients oi
History:
07/18/2001 Carla appears on her doctor's surgery with joint problems with a persistent temperature. increase.
Some quotes from the medical report made extensive research in the nav MCL rheumatologist. Physician wanted her to put Brufin. No further action from the GP. Carla wanted to know why she had to swallow this medication and early referral to rheumatologist!
Case history: because of pain in all joints patient had visited the rheumatologist. The weight was probably slightly decreased in appetite. Not objectified. She has been suffering from fever 4 weeks to 38.5 degrees C. No clear night sweats, no itching. She has no pain. They moderate cough without sputum. No dyspnoea. Her husband went to sea last week. (Addition of Carla's husband, after the doctor checked to have whether this was justified, he too was concerned after weeks of fever spikes and merchant navy officers are also such a medical professional that they have a reasonable history can be reduced. The doctor assured him that he quietly which could leave her husband full responsibility for the GP put down) She is left with two children aged 10 and 12 years. They almost never used alcohol and occasionally smokes a pack of cigarettes from her 18th year. Father had lung cancer, and deceased mother to breast cancer.
CT scan (thorax + abdomen) image for suspected malignant process re located. Upper lobe, about 4 cm. Where any metastasis in re. Liver lobe or in the adrenal gland can not be excluded. No obvious mediastinal lymphadenopathy.
Ultrasound abdomen: fire in re. Liver lobe, not really typical of haemangioom, enlarged li. adrenal with solid aspect. CT-guided puncture is recommended.
Discussion: arthralgia due to the patient who visited rheumatoloog shows a non-small cell lung cancer to the re. upper lobe to have a paraneoplastic phenomenon Pierre Marie Bamberger syndrome. As part of the work-up towards any operation there must first metastasis to li. adrenal and liver are excluded, with a CT-guided puncture to the li. adrenal probably the fastest of any inoperabiliteit lead. If patient is inoperable it seems the most appropriate chemotherapy.But this I will discuss with her.
Conclusion: non-small cell lung of the re. upper lobe, probably adenocarcinoma, with metastases has yet to be ruled out. Note: patient was already discussed for the thoraxchirrug to ensure the efficiency of any mediastinoscopy / lobectomy r. upper lobe.
... .. Pulmonologist.
Carla and her husband confirmed to me in their own words above conclusions. The months preceding the visit to the doctor in June 2001 had mw. V. many physical problems that almost all seemed to point to arthritis. Tired, aching joints, insomnia, etc. It turned out that Carla Pierre Marie Bamberger syndrome was active and this was her first rescue in time because it was discovered that she had a lung tumor. Pierre Marie Bamberger syndrome in fact is a substance secreted by a tumor on arthritis-like pains in the joints and bones caused. The reason for Carla to go to the doctor. She was initially a fairly heavy drug as painkiller for arthritis, called brufin, and a referral to a rheumatologist after emphatic insistence. Her husband, who then worked as a seaman, he knew his own idea that something is wrong, but after the doctor put the responsibility on to have (you can quietly go to the sea, nothing seriously wrong, his first "big" error, then piled the errors themselves with this doctor is on) and the reassuring words of Carla itself (former nurse), he still go to sea, hoping for rheumatism and nothing more serious. Her husband: "At the height of Tunisia, I called home and noticed that something was going on. Carla was initially not lose, but I insisted that she told the rheumatologist a big spot on her lung had seen did not seem malignant but further research was needed. I was with Carla agreed that once the outcome was known and negative (the patient) would be instantly I would be coming home. "
The suspect place in the liver was later haemangioom, a cluster of blood vessels that cancer was not. And because there is no metastases were found Carla was eligible for surgery on her lung tumor. On August 13, 2001, the lung tumor is surgically removed in the MCL
At that time they received information from her brother who oncologic surgeon. He also pointed to Pierre Marie Bamberger syndrome and Carla is still grateful to him for later, though their relationship will greatly subside.
In the weeks after surgery Carla gets severe symptoms such nausea, decreased appetite and falls sharply, 7 kg. In a few weeks time. Carla has also suffered from chronic headaches and almost feels pretty bad in the weeks after surgery. September 6, 2001, just four weeks after surgery, Carla again be included in the MCL (following drug intoxication by Brufin shown later)
The medical report of that recording this period include:
Discussion: I. Malaise and decreased appetite. The patient was admitted with general malaise and loss of appetite after lobsectomie. The patient was treated with intravenous and then Primperan symptoms improved. Because of the vague upper abdominal complaints, an ultrasound performed. Also, a gastroscopy performed with no organic abnormalities but delayed gastric emptying. With these findings, expectant policy. At the end of the patient record could reasonably eat again and she got dietary advice by dietitian.
II. Liver disorders, probably medication. On admission, shares of liver metastasis with no evidence of echo. Hepatitis serology was also deployed with the result that follows. Patient had to shoot every day Saridon used, which can cause severe liver dysfunction (!!!). After discontinuation Saridon decreased liver function, so that a possible cause might be. Liver functions were not normalized, will be monitored and outpatient patient left the hospital 14-09 in reasonable condition.
Conclusion:
I. malaise and weight loss without apparent cause. Gastroscopy delayed gastric emptying.
II. Liver Disorders agv Saridon possible. No evidence of meta consumption.
The month after that it is reasonable to Carla but she feels pretty good. In November, she is severely depressed with anxiety and phobias about going on an antidepressant. Until the end of January 2002 following increasing complaints, such as balance disorders, and seeing triple images, left-sided complete paralysis and ends with an urgent scan. The MCL and everything is working fully ina furious pace.
The history of this research done on Feb. 6. 2002:
When neurological manifestations in patient came and eventually triple images she had urgently referred to a neurologist determined that a solitary brain metastasis found ... .. in the cerebellum near the brain stem with two obscure spots that could indicate further metastasis. She was prescribed dexamethasone.
(Note From her husband: "After the scan, the neurologist in our waiting room, just a niche in the hall with chairs, there are also other patients waiting their turn, shook us up a jackhammer, the MCL is grown. Instead of us that this man quietly in his office invited us to bring this message of doom, he did it but just off in the waiting room. Ma'am, it looks very bleak for you. We can not do for you, and he was gone. Regular approach so!)
The pulmonologist recommended to radiation from February 7, 2002, but does it in the same medical report to the radiologist the following:
"I had an intense conversation with ms. V. and her husband have put in which I explained that the prognosis is determined by the metastases in the head. I understood that the location was such that a metastasectomie (red note: surgical removal), not possibilities ought not to inflict enormous damage. There is therefore of metastatic disease and no cure. Possibly. which only palliative intent chemotherapy could be given currently has no added value prognosis is determined by the head rather by any tumor location elsewhere in the body. I'm also currently no evidence of metastasis elsewhere, particularly the very recent chest radiograph shows an unaltered picture of a state after lobectomy RBK without evidence of tumor recurrence (note red: this is medical language for the surgical removal of the right lung lobe August 2001). In terms of prognosis I cautiously indicated that they should think in terms of months ".
Carla and her husband tell me they were completely off the map after this message. Her husband: "I was prepared, had enough on the internet about nageplozen brain and read that survival was nil, it printed, but not to Carla to read, but a confirmation is hard." Natural radiation could still follow, but Carla says, "I said if I have the birthday of my daughter but when." Carla did so within one month that they might no longer be there. Her daughter is 15 years old last Friday.
Miraculously, the radiation undergoes Carla well and she still lives in May 2002. However, it said that when the radiation was last metastasis (s) would not leave. Further research is no longer necessary. The irradiations were purely aimed at the time she still had to go high as enjoyable. It could still be that the radiation still spread (s) completely destroyed, all without prejudice to the pulmonologist and neurologist and radiologist did not predict nor believe right after the irradiation stopped. All the more reason to look for something a definitive cure could give.
Spring 2002 Carla and her husband reading a newspaper article about the approach and Eye4care called Bioresonance Robert Bos. While Carla's father (and grandfather and uncles) and her brother were GP oncological surgeon and thus grew up with regular care and little affinity with 'alternative' had she tells me now that she immediately felt: "I must know more . This is an opportunity. Her husband was skeptical about the alternative circuit is concerned, had himself worked in more than ten years before he went to sea again, but he could completely identify with the theory behind the Bioresonance story. But after the first consultation, he does not take the second consultation. Her husband: "I could completely identify with the story, I know the theory for 30 years, 30 years ago, I could produce a sinusoid on a CRT. It had to settle with me, I was sure that the next session sometimes a nuisance could be critical with confidence what Carla had to build up pressure on Robert would face. I did not want. The day after I have gone back, I had all together, leaving Robert a simple test do with me, which he just got what I wanted to hear. To this day we still do regularly, and it measures up. striking.)
Carla "I found it all a bit odd. You 'sinus' was measured, and I was really wondering if this is not a little weird was. A few threads on your wrists and a computer would then be seen how my energy etc. would be.Robert told Carla that he saw a troubled liver region and a disrupted energy flow which could indicate further metastasis. He begins hearing what eventually 12 treatments with intervals of several weeks would end. Carla is also referred to an orthomolecular physician Dr. Klatte for living blood. Carla her husband: "When we came in the train a whole bag full of vitamins and minerals had with us for a lot of money I thought so what's all this, we came for blood and otherwise we are with hundreds of dollars on pills gang. I wanted to say nothing, it's about her life, but Carla did it himself on the train after half hour to the bag had been staring. And a follow-up appointment that he would be made by his assistant, that appointment must still be made, never heard from him. " One part is still in the closet because Carla has a long time, but after a while she began to wonder why, she felt strong and healthy. Well, she used vitamin C and A. and some stuff on the advice of Robert but part remained untouched. We had a very uncomfortable feeling when Dr.Klatte. His medical blood analysis showed in his excellent blood count to see and not fungi ("Carla loves French cheese and ate it every day on her bread with tomato, cucumber, etc. and she does have."), But he sold us do a bag full of pills he had prescribed, we had not occurred and now on his yacht in Harlingen. I do not really kosher. "
Treatments for Robert (Eye4care) consisted of approximately 20 minutes after under a bench and before alternating magnetic tubes with blue and / or white light on your head. Ozone therapy that was called. Which also zappers (see Hulda Clark ) which were used by Robert weak current is sent through your body's energy fields that would normalize. And, says Carla, "I really felt after each time I had been feeling better. My headache went away and I got after the magnet bank more and more energy. After each treatment, a measure taken by Robert and looked more relaxed from . After 12 treatments was reached in his stabilisatie. Not that he thought the tumor (s) would be gone, but it would no longer active and are encapsulated.
A month later, the sinus became restless again and again now four treatments. This was repeated one month later a time and ended with two treatments. Meanwhile it was already autumn 2002 and the prognosis of several months of survival made by the pulmonologist in February 2002 had so long been refuted.
From let's say October / November 2002 to date (dated February 20, 2004), Carla had no complaints. Last February 2004 by Robert another measurement done but everything seemed fine and balanced. Carla feels well, is energetic, active in all day again, for the family but also for herself, enjoy life and I must say she's also brilliant at. Nothing indicates that a relapse could occur, but Carla says "you're always afraid. When you feel something, if only a bit of a headache, it comes back."
But now enjoying every day and she hopes she had long, very long time to maintain.
Who has any comments or reactions nav this story please send them to us and we'll send them to Carla and her husband.
