Current situation of November 4, 2001
Dated November 4, 2001: Today I received the following email from Ed. I put it here in full on this page. Our disclaimer will apply and what Ed wrote to his responsibility and I do not know whether he was right or not. But it seems interesting enough to even learn them. Ed has already created its own website: www.scdiet.nl , where much more information about his approach to Crohn's disease.
Hi Kees,
I use fish oil by now. Like many, this flaxoil Omega 3 fatty acids ..
Omega 3 fatty acids improve the health and indeed often works very positive in people with Crohn's disease.
http://www.scdiet.org/7archives/scd010_6
The fish oil is purely to support .. The only SCDiet has actually already solved the problem .. I also have a Dutch SCDiet site set up.
If you read the theory, you know that it is good (possibly adapted) this diet is also used in cancer ..
It is now really nothing but the best way to me .. It turns out I also have an intracellular magnesium deficiency .. Now I take magnesium supplements, it is much better.
Under Update October 27, 2001 you can read how magnesium plays an important role in sugar metabolism and the immune system:
I've been in contact with the Crohn's Colitis Association and with any luck they SCDiet an article about places in their magazine ..
However, it is open to question .. I nml. occasionally some doubts about the objectivity and independence of associations ..
Look under the other is to extract from the monthly magazine of the Canadian Association of Colitis: Quote: UPDATE: Annual Awards Dinner made in excess of $ 250,000 (not final). Thanks go to the Food Industry for Their wonderful support.
If the Crohn's Colitis Association decided to post my article, then I write to national newspapers .. Experience shows that there is always one or more newspapers that want to publish .. I restrict myself to SCDiet then, because otherwise too much and too complex in an article .. Moreover, an anti-food pyramid has often unsuccessful campaign conducted (Atkins Oa) ..
I also broadcast last seen around 10 and I thought it was outrageous what happened there .. Especially the final sentence that especially at the site of Burr to look .. Really absurd .. I now really starting to believe a conspiracy theory .. For example, the government knows that the current diet (food pyramid) is very bad for your health .. As more and more people are fat and diabetes (and cancer) will be happy just said that we have less fat and more carbohydrates to eat .. Perhaps an interesting book to read once: Lights Out - Sleep, Sugar and Survival
In this book the author clearly demonstrates the U.S. government certainly knows how the fork in the stem is .. It shows very clearly that the companies have more power than the politicians .. Who are the political campaigns paid? Correct: The companies, and then to a large extent the food and the pharmaceutical industry ..
Last I read a typical report in the newspaper. That was about a pharmaceutical company that cholesterol-lowering drugs, antihypertensive drugs and medication for diabetics produce. The article asks the journalist wonders why the market for these products continues to grow ever .. While the company spokesperson said that it is partly due to population growth, he is not the real reason, he really does know: Excessive carbohydrate consumption! As soon as he could tell, his company lost a huge amount of market share. The problem is that the NL government is not impartial. They also by the huge blow to the economy would be if suddenly there is no diabetes, overweight, high cholesterol and / or blood pressure would be .. Moreover, they find it maybe nice when people die around their 60th birthday (or earlier from a heart attack or breast cancer or prostate cancer). This saves substantially in the factstate budget.
I am going a couple of nutritionists and physicians who have completed their studies almost ask what they have learned about food .. Besides questions about the rationale for the food pyramid (which simply is not), I also wonder if they even remotely minerals and vitamins have learned to appreciate. Furthermore, I ask how they are open-minded and I will refer them my theory .. I fear that in their study are so brainwashed that they do not dare to have their own opinion. The genes in class but his own opinion had always been laughed at by the teachers and fellow students. I'm afraid it their broadmindedness very limited. On the other hand you see it more and more (domestic) physicians who decide (often out of frustration) to alternative / orthomolecular physician ..
Also read "What's wrong with our modern way of life" The bottom barrel me just how together these points together and the emergence of the growing influence of cancer ..
Also read the studies showing that the ketogenische diet (high fat, very low carb) adversely affect the cancer growth.
One study is also about Flaxoil:
Oh, I read in weekly menu that olive oil may be used. It is wise to be extra-virgin use. (Editors note: Houtsmuller all recommends extra virgin olive oil on. See assumptions Houtsmuller Diet ) This does not mess until the second pressing (read: when the goo left from the first pressing is once pressed) is introduced. Extra virgin does indeed not have to be expensive .. Lorena is the first olive oil, extra virgin and costs less than f 5, - per 750ml and tastes perfectly .. In 2000 by the Consumers choose the best olive oil! In ALDI to purchase.
What I find strange is that the diet of bread, potatoes and high-glycemic fruits are allowed, while sugar is not allowed .. This is a contradiction ..
If you eat a boiled potato, it is rapidly converted in the intestines (starches -> maltose -> glucuose + glucose). The glucose molecules in the blood very quickly end up with a quick blood sugar rise as a result .. The result is that this particular cancer cells grow rapidly and thus consume .. The same is true for all starches ..
Fruit is also strange, because this huge amount of sugar. For example, 15% grape sugar which is used directly by the cancer cells. I also wonder whether cancer cells are able to use fatty acids, which is claimed Houtsmuller. Cancer cells have an anaerobic metabolism and can be very difficult / not metabolize fatty acids ..
Furthermore, the modern fruit not on the fruit as it was originally .. Take a wild blackberry and compare them to modern grape .. In the wild variety are many more antioxidants, vitamins, minerals and fiber and less sugar .. That ratio is the modern fruit all wrong .. The modern fruit is really not healthy .. It is grown on taste (ie sweetness) instead of health ..
If you look past what man (10,000 years ago and before) ate, we notice that we mainly ate meat, and especially the organ meats. We had a particular preference for fat bodies .. Thus, the brains and abdominal fat eaten first. If anything remained, it was the lean muscle tissue, especially what we eat. It contains hardly any vitamins, minerals and fats .. Did you know that a lot of brains example Omega3 fatty acids .. You do not need to eat this fish .. I understand that eating brains is not really interesting, but that is certainly what we used to eat it and to my knowledge there was then no cancer, diabetes, high blood pressure, etc.. The diet also consisted largely of fat (about 50-60%) while the other half consisted mainly of protein. Carbohydrates we ate only very small amounts in the summer (low glycemic fruits and honey) .. Maybe you find this page interesting.
Here you can find all the vitamins, minerals, macro nutrients, amino acids and compare ..
It could be that the Houtsmuller diet works properly,because the focus has moved more than high-carbohydrate to low / medium-carbohydrate. I expect, however, better results are still less sugar consumed (or disguised sugars in the form of starches) are. (Editorial Note: Adding sugar is not allowed in the Houtsmuller diet and is recommended for juicing fruit juice always Mix with vegetable juices. In principle, only grapefruit juice and lemon juice without mixing natural use. Houtsmuller Diet, see assumptions)
But I think it is okay to eat more fat, because the cancer cells, by definition, can do anything with it anyway. The healthy fats cells are perfect and even the heart is running purely on saturated fats. If there are not enough, these fats are converted to glucose. Did you know that 50% of every cell in our body consists of the mitochondria .. It can directly without intermediate steps convert fat into ATP molecules (energy units), whereas glucose increments only 2 can be converted and then also highly inefficient (only 50% energy output compared with the same amount of fat). http:// # cellbio.utmb.edu/cellbio/mitochondria_1.htm substructure
So, that was a very long story .. Hopefully it does not become too complex .. Oh, maybe you'll find it quite extensively as I write above .. Everything is perfectly justified, especially in the book Lights Out in the book Life Without Bread (which I'm reading now).
Lights Out The book contains about 1 / 3 of references to studies ..
Mvgr, Ed
